Movie Review

Movie Review – Daredevil


– Summary –

Director :   Mark Steven Johnson
Year Of Release :   2003
Principal Cast :  Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, Colin Farrell, Michael Clarke Duncan, Scott Terra, Jon Favreau, Joe Pantoliano, David Keith, Leland Orser, Erick Avari, Derrick O’Connor.
Approx Running Time :   103 Minutes
Synopsis:   Blind lawyer by day, costumed crime fighter Daredevil by night, Matt Murodock seeks justice for those who cannot find it any other way.
What we think :   Honestly, it’s not as bad as I recall, although it’s certainly no classic. Ben Affleck’s first foray into costumed crime fighting, for Marvel no less, features a decent opening “origin” sequence, and then goes all downhill fast. The heroic characters are played dead straight, while the villains are all over-performed, leading to a tonal mismatch that hinders the film’s strengths from ever taking hold. Some decent visual concepts can’t help some ordinary digital effects (by today’s standards, the CG human avatars stick out like dogs balls!), and the script veers wildly from arrow-straight comic-book to eye-rolling tripe, trying to both introduce the titular character but also a slew of secondary ones in an effort to establish a franchise, and succeeding at neither.


Batfleck Begins.

Before it became a film-making juggernaut in its own right, Marvel Comics unleashed a number of its properties to external Hollywood studios; X-Men to 20th Century Fox, and Spider-Man to Sony Pictures, being the two signifigant IP’s then outside of Marvel’s direct control. Also following X-Men to Fox was Daredevil, a heroic blind dude with enhanced hearing and a penchant for taking down the scum of New York during the dead of night. In any other universe, he might have been called Batman, but for Marvel, and creator Stan Lee, Daredevil was their answer to combating DC’s ubiquitously popular mortal hero. With the success of X-Men, a film that cut through into the mainstream in a way comic-book films to that point hadn’t really achieved (with the exception of Tim Burton’s Batman back in ’89), Fox ramped up production on their only other Marvel property, Daredevil, casting then still-popular Ben Affleck as the titular hero. It’s fair to say that Daredevil met with mixed feelings on release – many fanboys derided the performance of Affleck (who snagged a Golden Raspberry for his work here) and threw creative stones at director Mark Steven Johnson for somehow “ruining” Daredevil, but a few critics also felt that, when compared to the latter stages of Warner Bros’ Batman franchise, then mired in camp shittiness, Daredevil at least partially succeeded in getting things back on track. Not having seen this film since around 2004, I decided to give it a re-watch, to see for myself whether the taint was warranted, or whether Daredevil was simply a film too ahead of its time.

The new Red Bull advertising campaign was a killer!!!
The new Red Bull advertising campaign was a killer!!!

Plot synopsis courtesy Wikipedia:  Matt Murdock (Ben Affleck) is a blind lawyer who lives in New York City’s Hell’s Kitchen, running a firm with his best friend Franklin “Foggy” Nelson (Jon Favreau), who only defends innocent people and does not require monetary payment. As a child, Matt (Scott Terra) was blinded after toxic waste was spilled over his eyes while he was taking a shortcut home from school after discovering that his father, former boxer Jack “The Devil” Murdock (David Keith), had become an enforcer for a local mobster. The accident, however, also enhanced his other senses and gave him a sonar that allowed him to “see” through sonic vibrations. Matt uses his sharpened senses to train himself in martial arts. His father, blaming himself for his disability, stopped being an enforcer and went back to boxing. However, his new career was short-lived and he was murdered after refusing to turn in a fixed fight by the same mobster that had employed him earlier. To avenge his father’s death, Matt used his abilities to become a crime-fighter known as “Daredevil”, who operates in Hell’s Kitchen, going after the criminals that escape the conventional means of justice. One day, Matt meets Elektra Natchios (Jennifer Garner). Elektra is the daughter of Nikolas Natchios (Erick Avari), a businessman that has dealings with Wilson Fisk (Michael Clarke Duncan), a rich executive who is also the criminal leader of New York City’s Underworld, known and feared as the Kingpin. When Nikolas tries to bail on his dealings with the Kingpin, the mobster hires the Irish hitman Bullseye (Colin Farrell), who never misses a shot, to kill him. Daredevil tries to stop Bullseye, even causing him to miss a shot, but Bullseye ultimately succeeds in killing Nikolas and framing Daredevil in the process. As a result, Elektra swears to take revenge on him as reporter Ben Urich (Joe Pantoliano), who had been investigating Daredevil’s activities, discovers his secret identity. Hunted by both Elekra and Bullseye, Daredevil must fly into the New York night to right the wrongs he sees, bringing justice to the innocent.

Say what you will about my acting, but at least I'm committed to my body art!
Say what you will about my acting, but at least I’m committed to my body art!

In watching Daredevil some 10 plus years after it originally released, it’s easy enough to spot the film’s many flaws, particularly with the hindsight of what seems like countless Comic Book Movies in the intervening time. Daredevil stands on the brink of being a truly modern, slick, stylish CBM, in much the same light as the Batman franchise would under Chris Nolan’s direction, harder in tone and more gritty and determined to set itself in a reality that felt legitimate; yet, in saying that, it’s a film still stuck somewhat in the pre-milennial era of the genre. The script, written by director Mark Steven Johnson (whose past writing credits included both Grumpy Old Men flicks!) is one of those Important Film types, the kind that tries hard to say something worthwhile but ends up just clunking from the jowls of the actors performing it. Daredevil’s roots of urban warfare and heroism in the face of disability (he was the first – and to my knowledge, only – blind hero in comics!) seemed to crystallize in Johnson’s mind as a dark and manifestly depressing state, leaving the film resolutely – nay, defiantly – dressed in darkness for a lot of its running time.

Sorry guys, I think my voice-box just fell into my bowel.
Sorry guys, I think my voice-box just fell into my bowel.

The film is a story of two parts. The first, the opening twenty minutes or so, is the obligatory “origin” story, outlining how Matt Murdock came to be blinded, gaining his enhanced hearing, and setting on the path to bring justice to those who cannot get it. Young Scott Terra is excellent as the prepubescent Matt Murdock, and his screen presence, particularly as he handles almost every scene of this sequence with substantial panache, is effortless. The second part of Daredevil is the moment Ben Affleck rises out of his soundproof coffin isolation tank, and the “adult” story kicks in. It’s this second part, comprising the bulk of the film, that mismanages its characters badly. The story interweaves Murdock’s arc with that of Elektra’s, with a badly written romance and some horrendously choreographed fight scenes trying their utmost to skewer the chemistry between Affleck and Garner (they would be married in 2005) as the two leads. Couple that with a horrible Bullseye in Colin Farrell (not his fault, entirely, but more a product of the script and the expectation of audiences for manic screen villains!) and a dead-on casting decision in Michael Clarke Duncan as the villainous Kingpin. The Affleck-led part of the story is primarily shrouded in darkness; even sequences shot during the day feel depressing and lacking in pop!

This copy of the script is so bad I need glasses to protect my eyes!!!
This copy of the script is so bad I need glasses to protect my eyes!!!

The fact that Johnson’s script so mishandles the darker aspects of Daredevil’s character makes it tough going for audiences. The Batman-esque killing of Murdock’s father, and the boy’s subsequent quest for redemptive vengeance, never quite feels organic like it should, standing too deeply in the shadow of the Dark Knight’s more iconic motivation. Johnson doesn’t even seem to try and make it different or fresh, he merely recycles the concept and hamfistedly shoots it much like Burton did years before in Batman. Murdock’s life seems to be something of a callow fraud, his moping and skulking about his dark apartment, coupled with a fierce determination in court to see wrongs righted, at emotional odds with Daredevil’s swinging and flying from the rooftops of New York. There’s no continuity to Daredevil as far as character beats go, as if the demands of the script are utterly dependent on whosoever showed up to shoot that day. That’s a hard thing to get past, but it’s the way it seemed.

Like a badly choreographed S&M session.
Like a badly choreographed S&M session.

As one expects, Ben Affleck gives the role his all. Obviously recognizing the iconic nature of the part, especially for comic fans, Affleck tries to imbue Murdock with all the hidden pain, angst and buried sorrow he can muster, but thanks to Johnson’s slap-dash screenplay and unbalanced tone for the villains, it doesn’t play out as well as the dude would like. Garner, in a role soon to be spun off into a feature all for her (Elektra, released in 2005) gives Elektra a sexy toughness, almost like Linda Hamilton in Terminator 2, and although she certainly gives it her all and delivers a nice screen chemistry with Affleck, she’s sadly not the main character and consequently falls by the wayside as soon as it’s convenient. Her apparent “death” in the latter stages of the film lacks any emotional wallop whatsoever, thanks to Johnson’s deftly inadequate direction. Colin Farrell might well consider his sex tape the highlight of his career by comparison to this role, a snarling, skittish, creepy assassin in Bullseye; as a film character, Bullseye is written as simply a stock-standard psychopath, something that doesn’t work as well now as it might have then. Now, even the villains need some kind of sympathetic backstory, an audience-involving reason for their Bad Guy-ness, but Bullseye does not have that. He’s just a crazy hired killer, albeit a dangerous one at that. And the late, great Michael Clarke Duncan has the physique and presence the play Wilson Fisk (aka the Kingpin) – there were hints of racism at the time of his casting, because in the comics, Fisk is white, while Duncan is – duh – black; I actually enjoyed Duncan in this role, with his sheer physical size more than making him a match for the agile Daredevil. Problematically for Duncan, the role is again somewhat showy, overblown and – I hate this term – campy, in that he’s more a caricature of a bad person than an actual bad person. And the less said of Jon Favreau’s role as Murdock’s lawyer sidekick – an almost identical parallel with his role as Tony Stark’s bodyguard in the Marvel Iron Man films – the better.

Don't look now, but I'm going to have to have you killed for no good reason.
Don’t look now, but I’m going to have to have you killed for no good reason.

Aside from the story and character problems, Daredevil’s tenacity in coupling practical and digital effects make it one of those “awkward” films of the dawning digital age. The use of CG avatar’s to replace actual actors, where practicality determined it wasn’t safe to swing Ben Affleck between skyscrapers and alleyways, do seem a tad fake (of course, I’m looking back through eyes ruined by effects films such as Avatar and Transformers) nowadays, but for the time they blend rather well. It’s obvious that the night sequences aide the “hiding of the seams” in this regard, as more often the CG humans in this film are hidden in shadow, or obscured by them. The high point of the film is easily the “sonar vision” Murdock employs to “see” things. It’s a terrific effect, and used well by Johnson in giving us as an audience a taste of what it might be like to have to rely on this kind of “power” to get by. Naturally, for a character with enhanced hearing, the sound for this film is heightened substantially, with an omnipresent soundfield employed to spatially locate all moments of aural activity while Murdock is on the screen. It’s a technique that many might miss these days, especially in light of the overabundance of 3-dimensional audio tracks on most films these days, but if you’re coming to the film after a long absence, be sure to pay attention to the sound mix, and how precise it is.

Hey girlfriend, this is for all those times you yelled at me for leaving the toilet seat up!
Hey girlfriend, this is for all those times you yelled at me for leaving the toilet seat up!

Daredevil has its problems, not the least was having to overcome Johnson’s dead-hand story and lack of ability to craft accessible characters. Some still point the finger at Ben Affleck as the reason for the film’s lack of status, but I sincerely believe he would have made a great Daredevil had the script and direction of the film been better, cleaner, more defined. The film struggles to balance the seriousness of Daredevil’s story with the cartoonish villains and lack of hard-edged scheme the Kingpin might have, lost amidst the canyons of a dark, rainy New York (apparently it rains on cue for Daredevil, which would make him a better weatherman than a lawyer!); strange sideplots and underdeveloped leading characters limit the scope of the film’s ability to achieve its desired outcome. Daredevil isn’t as terrible as the internet would have you believe (it’s certainly above average, for me), and for all its faults it’s still a reasonably decent CBM in spite of all that working against it.




10 thoughts on “Movie Review – Daredevil

    1. I think the film's main problem is Johnson's uneven tone. The mix between Daredevil's tragic past and sombre mission to thwart evil, Elektra's vengeful beauty, and Bullseye and Kingpin's cornball, Schmacher-esque villany, just doesn't work overall. Bits of this film work, some of it doesn't (but the origin sequence is still really well made) and it's a shame, becaue I conitnue to believe that Affleck wasn't rhe reason this thing failed. The Daredevil/Elektra sequences also felt a little forced, contrived to get them on-screen together. You could kinda see what the film WANTED to do with them, it was just the execution letting them down.

      You should check it out, though, Ruth, if only to see what Affleck might look like when his turn comesin the Batsuit…..

    1. I went back to it expecting a lot worse, that's for sure, so I was surprised at how much I found to enjoy about it in the end. Look, it's not total shit like the internet would have us believe, but it's no classic either. I think you're enjoyment of it will probably hinge more on Grim Affleck than anything else, so with that in mind you're probably right to miss this one.

    1. I recall being extremely disappointed by this one when I saw it at the cinema – it felt…. underwhelming and unbalanced tonally. The mix of Daredevil's sombre attitude, and the cornball antics of the film's villains, was a little…. off. And although time hasn't made it any worse, my appreciation of what it attempted to do has actually improved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll Up